Driverless car, will hit them?

Driverless car
Driverless car
In 2014, a new game was created for the survey of the MIT Media Lab in the United States. In the very first moment of the accident, the user is told that in such a situation, what will the driver without a car, who will hit. The morale test of the machine is called 'Moral Machine'.

The game has more than four crore games in the last four years. People in 233 areas of the world have said that what should be the driverless cars at the time of the crisis. One of the major surveys run on moral decisions Four years ago the makers did not think Moral machine will respond.

Analysis of the data obtained from the survey shows that moral decisions depend on the culture of a person, its position, its economic condition. Whether it is a matter of information technology or more specifically a driverless vehicle. The MIT published the paper in Nature magazine.

Moral machine testing is like a trolley problem. The trolley is fast approaching the railway track. The railroad has been divided in front of it. Five on one path, one man in another The way the trolley will go, that means there is a key to changing the path in one's hands. The speed of the trolley is so much that there is no scope to stop or save people from the path. Either one, five or five people will die. The key is in your hand, the decision will be on your way to a car?

Moral machines have also been asked nine questions like the Trolley Problem. Illustrating the situation in the situation, it is said, who will drive a carless vehicle - humans or animals? Passenger or pedestrian? Less or more people? High or low? Women or men? Weak or strong? The young man is old? Law abiding or disobeying? Will the end of the road be in the way, or understand the situation and try to do something instead?

Again there was also the question that the car will push the three old pedestrians straight, or turn around three young people in the face of death in the face of death. The answer to such questions depends on the respondent's country and economic condition. For example, people like China or Japan have the right to save lives. It is for their respect only to the old people.

Although desperate, the likelihood of saving the pedestrians liked the citizens of comparatively poor countries. And in those countries, the economic variance among the people, the answer to the higher and low-income is more in the north. And citizens of countries like the United States and the United States favor more people than people. There is more resemblance to the response of citizens of nearby countries. In the result of the survey, the diversity of the population in the west, east and south countries is found in the north.

The MIT study has the operational quality. Because, in countries where automated cars are used and the places where these cars are built, the head of the government can consider legislation. Along with this, researchers believe that the research will also help in artificial intelligence.
Next Post »


Click here for Comments
December 16, 2018 at 1:17 AM ×

driverless car..��

Congrats bro aniyah you got PERTAMAX...! hehehehe...

Total Pageviews